4 ms·
How much of this article is written by the author instead of Cadence itself? The use of certain adjectives to describe how excellent some numbers are seems weir
by gtirloni 2y ago
How much of this article is written by the author instead of Cadence itself? The use of certain adjectives to describe how excellent some numbers are seems weird coming from a generic news editor. I don't know if I can trust this is as groundbreaking as it sounds.
- kees99 2y agoAlso, very sparse on technical details. Even basics are missing, like - what's optical signal like? CWDM? multiple polarizations? QAM? How many fibers? I mean - one can build a 16-fiber, CWDM16 monstrosity that would transport an 8x 128GT/s PCIe using mere 8 Gbit/s per channel - all of which is technology that was "groundbreaking" circa 2005.