3 ms·
Hmmm. But I hadn't wanted a special tag. http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0186.html http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/01
by ktizo 14y ago
Hmmm. But I hadn't wanted a special tag.
http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0186.html http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0186.ht...
Maybe in the mildest sense imaginable, because he thought there was a better way of implementing it.
- tedsuo 14y agoFunny, I went back up a post and noticed it was Marc Andreessen who proposed the img tag: http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0182.html http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0182.ht...
- guelo 14y agoAnd really Tim was right, a more general embedding tag, including text chunks, would have made the web better over the last 20 years.