4 ms·
- It loses in single-core benchmark (2418 vs 3082) - It wins in multi-core (14352 vs 12087) and transcode (6:50 vs 7:19) while requiring 4 more cores (12 vs 8
by frankjr 2y ago
- It loses in single-core benchmark (2418 vs 3082)
- It wins in multi-core (14352 vs 12087) and transcode (6:50 vs 7:19) while requiring 4 more cores (12 vs 8 (4+4)) and active cooling
Where's the blowing away part?
- solnyshok 2y agothe fan
- rsynnott 2y agoI mean, it makes a better headline than "meh, it's kinda competitive", I suppose... But yeah, hard to characterise this as 'blowing away' (also a little suspect that they don't present a graphics comparison).
- bfrog 2y agoIt’s dead in the water from my perspective. Tied to windows baggage, not actually faster, arm windows apps are… yeah not exactly vast in number.
- antisthenes 2y ago> Where's the blowing away part? That would be the active cooling.