It doesn't. One page 17 section 28 says "... constantly assess the performance of the detection technologies and ensure that they are sufficiently reliable, a

It doesn't. One page 17 section 28 says "... constantly assess the performance of the detection technologies and ensure that they are sufficiently reliable, as well as to identify false positives and avoid to the extent erroneous reporting to the EU Centre, providers should ensure human oversight and, where necessary, human intervention, adapted to the type of detection technologies and the type of online child sexual abuse at issue. Such oversight should include regular assessment of the rates of false negatives and positives generated by the technologies, based on an analysis of anonymised representative data sample" and for the draft law language see page 60 which says that after the user reported something the provider forwards is anonymized to this new EU Centre, where there human verification has to take place. So supposedly this means our tax will pay for folks to look at a ton of rashes and pimples.