> What the LLM community refuses to see is that there is a limit to the patience and the financing the rest of the world will grant you before you're told, "it

> What the LLM community refuses to see is that there is a limit to the patience and the financing the rest of the world will grant you before you're told, "it doesn't work mate." The point about LLM's is they may have a lot of drawbacks right now but they're improving at a rapid pace. They already are very useful. There are hundreds of stories coming out of companies effectively leveraging them to replace workers in many natural-language related tasks. They're far more useful than a car that goes off a cliff. Nobody more useful than an LLM is being effectively replaced by an LLM. Those few companies that jump the gun too early are suffering for it. >That sign We already have dishwashers and washing machines. Companies are working on making humanoid robots that can do those things, it's just that it's harder to develop a fully-fledged embodied humanoid than it is to create the diffusion models and LLM's being used today. It's not some conspiracy to let AI do all the fun stuff first. Nobody is preventing anyone from making art or writing poetry. If someone finds value in AI art or writing, either you have to accept that they weren't the audience member you wanted, or you have to accept that your ability to be creative is a learnable algorithm same as anything else.