2 ms·
I would consider this evidence that language predates human vocalizations. We already know deaf children will invent signs and gestures to communicate, and lang
by stubish 2y ago
I would consider this evidence that language predates human vocalizations. We already know deaf children will invent signs and gestures to communicate, and language not dependent on a hyoid bone. Do we have any way of dating the relevant neural structures through genetics?
- throwaway87651 2y agoFOXP2 was thought to be the genetic basis for language, but this has been overturned[1]. As far as I know there isn't a good candidate for a gene selected for language. [1] https://www.the-scientist.com/language-gene-dethroned-64608 https://www.the-scientist.com/language-gene-dethroned-64608
- davidmnoll 2y agoI think we’d have trouble because we’d have to tie the gene to a specific linguistic cognitive function. My hypothesis is that humans configured themselves into self-replicating group structures I’d call institutions, and language evolved as a way to facilitate that. These institutions exhibit all the thermodynamic properties of life, and they have goal directed behavior independent of individual humans.