3 ms·
Is this just a form of continuation passing style? I get that it's a bit functional-y, and more complex that typical go code (admittedly a very low bar), but I
by kortex 2y ago
Is this just a form of continuation passing style? I get that it's a bit functional-y, and more complex that typical go code (admittedly a very low bar), but I don't think it's too bad. It's no worse than async generators in python, and it's downright elementary compared to anything template metaprogramming.
I don't mind the pace that Go has been moving at when it comes to new features. It still feels very conservative while still evolving.