4 ms·
But that is of little help when you want to train an LLM to do the job at your company. A human requires just a little bit of tutorials and help, an LLM still r
by Jensson 2y ago
But that is of little help when you want to train an LLM to do the job at your company. A human requires just a little bit of tutorials and help, an LLM still require an unknown amount of data to get up to speed since we haven't reached that level yet.
- infgeoax 2y agoYeah humans can generalize much faster than LLM with far fewer "examples" running on sandwiches and coffee.
- logicchains 2y ago>Yeah humans can generalize much faster than LLM with far fewer "examples" running on sandwiches and coffee. This isn't really true. If you give an LLM a large prompt detailing a new spoken language, programming language or logical framework with a couple examples, and ask it to do something with it, it'll probably do a lot better at it than if you just let an average human read the same prompt and do the same task.
- infgeoax 2y agoHmm, but is it really "generalizing" or just pulling information from the training data? I think that's what this benchmark is really about: to adapt to something it has never seen before quickly.