Yes. Life has nuance. She was betting all humans would be decent people, and they clearly are not. Darwin awards exist for a reason: You can blame a victim if t

Yes. Life has nuance. She was betting all humans would be decent people, and they clearly are not. Darwin awards exist for a reason: You can blame a victim if they're ignoring all common sense. What if she: Goes for a hike at the Grand canyon, with no water, becomes dehydrated, and dies. Smokes and drinks her entire life, suffers a massive heart attack, and dies. Rides a bike to work with no helmet, is hit by a truck, and suffers permanent brain damage. Invests her live savings in NFTs and has to declare bankruptcy. Victim blaming is OK with me in all of these scenarios.