3 ms·
This is addressed in the second half of the article > Strictly following Moseley and Marks’s definition, the fact that we can get the user (or the customer, or
by lantry 2y ago
This is addressed in the second half of the article
> Strictly following Moseley and Marks’s definition, the fact that we can get the user (or the customer, or the product owner) to accept a change of requirements, implies that the removed complexity wasn’t essential in the first place.
- jt2190 2y agoLet me editorialize that: > Strictly following Mosley and Marks’s different definition because it’s strange and I can easily poke holes in it… Again, I’m not sure why it was necessary to “strictly follow” that bizarre definition of essential complexity, one that seems to define anything a user says as “essential”.