I don't think he's as critical as you say. He just views LLMs as the product of intelligence rather than intelligence itself. LLM fans will say this is a false

I don't think he's as critical as you say. He just views LLMs as the product of intelligence rather than intelligence itself. LLM fans will say this is a false distinction, I guess. His definition of intelligence is interesting: something that can quickly achieve tasks with few priors or experience. I also think the idea of using human "Core Knowledge" priors is a clever way to make a test.