4 ms·
Still no justification to require overly invasive security measures such as requiring access to personal communication etc. Also completely useless for anythin
by SODaniel 14y ago
Still no justification to require overly invasive security measures such as requiring access to personal communication etc.
Also completely useless for anything than purely 'selecting' who you let in since I am going to assume a terrorist wouldn't exactly use terrorist185@hotmail.com and then hand the email over when asked.
- mayanksinghal 14y agoExactly and Israel is not the only country that faces terrorism. India does as well, and as an Indian - I would out-rightly reject any such measures.
- planetguy 14y ago> Still no justification to require overly invasive security measures such as requiring access to personal communication etc Israel is full of overly invasive security measures. The alternative is probably just to bar access to the country altogether, or at least bar it to people of certain backgrounds.
- davidf18 14y agoI wouldn't second guess Israeli security measures...unlike TSA, these are highly trained people who undoubtedly have military training since with few exceptions (Arab or Orthodox Jewish) not only men but women are drafted for military service. If you don't like the security measures then don't go there.
- tnash 14y agoAnd Arabs can volunteer to join the army, even though they are not drafted, and some do.
- marcf 14y ago> If you don't like the security measures then don't go there. But what happens if you are Palestinian like the people in these stories and as a politically aware Palestinian you become active in pro-Palestinian activism because you care about the rights and freedoms of your people? Those are the people that Israeli is targeting if you read these articles.