3 ms·
COM [1] was a solution to these problems thirty years ago. In-process it's just function calls. Cross-process COM has automatic marshalling for standard types
by masfuerte 2y ago
COM [1] was a solution to these problems thirty years ago.
In-process it's just function calls. Cross-process COM has automatic marshalling for standard types ("automation types") or you can define custom marshalling that does whatever you want.
WinRT [2] is a more modern version. It builds on COM and (among other things) provides the basis for the latest UI frameworks in Windows.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Component_Object_Model https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Component_Object_Model
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Runtime https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Runtime
- nsguy 2y agoA long time ago I worked on a project where we needed to distribute an in process COM object, so we moved it to DCOM, instantiated multiple instances, and that worked! All in all COM was a fairly pleasant technology. Not really that different than gRPC (e.g. idl vs. proto).