From a different perspective you might think some of the principles of rapid technology development that have been honed over the last few decades in computer s

From a different perspective you might think some of the principles of rapid technology development that have been honed over the last few decades in computer science and software engineering could be applied to some of the most perennial sluggish projects (at the other end of the spectrum) and have a predictable outcome. Maybe so and it can't be really analogous but isn't one of the things that is still plaguing software people memory leaks? How important is that? And to what degree is that a problem which arose due to a little too much hastiness early on? And for how long afterward? How much speculative investment has there been in software-related high-growth industries since, and if it was enough to put memory leaks in the rear-view mirror, when did that turning point finally occur? With nuclear it seems a lot more is at stake, so people would want to know how long has the possibility of that kind of leakage been completely overcome before widespread deployment would be agreeable anywhere near living things. Disregarding intentional diversion of non-leaking sources to be fair. But I would estimate that malicious operators who are just after your money are more hand-wavy than it seems when it comes to leakage or security in the digital tech business for sure.