> I suspect astronomers don't care for Starlink "photo bombing" their observations. Quite the opposite: - A call for scientists to halt the spoiling of the ni

> I suspect astronomers don't care for Starlink "photo bombing" their observations. Quite the opposite: - A call for scientists to halt the spoiling of the night sky with artificial light and satellites(https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-022-01864-z https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-022-01864-z) - Let there be (natural) light(https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-01935-9 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-01935-9) - Bright satellites are disrupting astronomy research worldwide(https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03610-5 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03610-5) - Satellite swarms are threatening the night sky—and creating a new zone of environmental conflict(https://www.science.org/content/article/satellite-swarms-are-threatening-night-sky-creating-new-zone-environmental-conflict https://www.science.org/content/article/satellite-swarms-are...) - ‘Unsustainable’ how satellite swarms pose a rising threat to astronomy(https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01420-9 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01420-9)