2 ms·
This may deserve a down vote because it is not valuable content, but in 21 minutes this has 32 votes. Can someone please chime in a tell me why they feel this d
by jnorthrop 14y ago
This may deserve a down vote because it is not valuable content, but in 21 minutes this has 32 votes. Can someone please chime in a tell me why they feel this deserves the front page of HN?
- joering2 14y agook, for example: I upvoted here because as much as this does not bring any new knowledge to the table, #1) it is unusual news to begin with, and more important #2) I am dying to hear other HN users commenting on it. So that's all the secret behind reasons to upvote this.
- jcfrei 14y agoyou apparently clicked it - that's honestly to say all that it takes. there's nothing wrong with wanting to see a picture of mark zuckerberg trying out a random chat service. stop diluting yourself - just admit you wanted to see it and so did almost everybody else here on HN. if you're reading this comment you already showed your interest in it.
- delsarto 14y agoIt's worthy because within 21 minutes, 32 people, based on their internal criteria, thought it was worth upvoting? Isn't that the whole point of voting?