3 ms·
That can be an issue, although - I think - the European approach will be to block private and semi-private data (like fb posts), but allow public data (articles
by kolinko 2y ago
That can be an issue, although - I think - the European approach will be to block private and semi-private data (like fb posts), but allow public data (articles etc).
In Poland we have a team of people who work on SpeakLeash which is 1TB of polish texts freely available for anyone to train their models on - http://speakleash.org/en/speakleash-a-k-a-spichlerz-english/ http://speakleash.org/en/speakleash-a-k-a-spichlerz-english/
I can imagine models getting their knowledge and intelligence by getting trained on global - english and chinese - data, and then learning country specific languages and viewpoints from way smaller datasets.
You can see that already - gpt was trained on way less Polish language material than english, but it’s almkst just as smart and fluent in both.
As for cultural quirks - here it’s more about who does hrlf and alignment than the source material.
- mike_hearn 2y agoThat isn't the European approach. From the article: "Meta on Monday said it hoped to use Europeans' data to train its models. It promised to only use public posts and comments — not private chats and DMs — and to not use any content from anyone under the age of 18. Crucially, the biz said it would give Euro folks a chance to opt out; a safeguard not extended to the rest of the world." Private messages have never been in play here. The regulators are arguing that stuff posted for the whole world to see is not OK to use for training purposes if it was posted to Facebook, but it is OK if it was posted to a blog.