I was really, really hoping that this article might change my mind about Wikipedia editors; that it would show me that they have some legitimate points that I h

I was really, really hoping that this article might change my mind about Wikipedia editors; that it would show me that they have some legitimate points that I have been unaware of, and that the gripes about them are uninformed if not totally misguided. But geez, every sentence just doubles down on what we already can't stand about them--the relentless insistence on the letter of their law being the One True Way, and if you think there might be room for improvement then fuck you. If this is what passes for a defense, then the editorship is further gone than I thought.