I don't buy this at all. Too many differences, and at this resolution it is not that improbable for any font to have a doppelganger. Instead of looking for whi

I don't buy this at all. Too many differences, and at this resolution it is not that improbable for any font to have a doppelganger. Instead of looking for which vector font that have been rasterised at this resolution, I would sooner look for the font in bitmap font collections like this: https://github.com/ianhan/BitmapFonts https://github.com/ianhan/BitmapFonts I wouldn't be surprised though if the font was created 'from scratch'