> But humans really do appreciate and value the presence and interactions with other humans, and at the end of the day those interactions will serve as guardrai

> But humans really do appreciate and value the presence and interactions with other humans, and at the end of the day those interactions will serve as guardrails against the complete en- and bull-shittification that AI promises to accelerate. What I'm worried about is that people may value the interests of a super-persuasive AI more than other humans'. How many humans have fallen victim to cult leaders? How many humans believe in Q-Anon? Q-Anon and stuff like that prove that purely through memetic engineering millions of people can be subverted with respect to their natural interests. How far could a 100T parameter model get with that specific goal?