4 ms·
Let me get this straight: When you litter this site with low-quality inflammatory comments where you call people a Marxist, accuse them of intellectual dishone
by owenversteeg 2y ago
Let me get this straight:
When you litter this site with low-quality inflammatory comments where you call people a Marxist, accuse them of intellectual dishonesty, pure ideology, call them a paid shill etc that is fine.
When I call you out on that behavior that "nullifies my reasoning entirely" (???)
This site has high quality discussions in part of the higher level of effort people put in their comments. There are plenty of interesting arguments against my original comment! You could argue that labor costs may not continue to rise. Or you could argue that a large portion of the labor costs around nuclear are white-collar and could be reduced by using AI. Or you could argue that cost isn't everything and that a nuclear power program has several benefits for national security. I'd love to read a well-thought out response of any kind. Instead you wrote a huge list of low-quality points in every one of your responses. We all know that the manufacture of solar panels is evolving, and that nuclear can reduce carbon emissions, and that 1MW solar is not the same as 1MW nuclear, and that solar without batteries is not enough; similarly it should be obvious to anyone that maintaining a nuclear reactor is harder than maintaining a field of solar panels; commenting these things is a waste of everyone's time. Making twelve different tangentially-related points and offhand comments doesn't serve anyone. That is why I am frustrated.
- Herz 2y agoI reinvite you to re-read the discussion. You are the one who started making completely unnecessary and inappropriate comments about my personal profile, and how I spend my time. Besides all that, with every comment I have always been in the topic, I have always brought arguments. However, I consider the discussion closed.