4 ms·
But the initial dialog was more like Q: this is good steel still, why not use it? A: steel is never ideal, that's the problem. Oh really. Risk manage us
by wruza 2y ago
But the initial dialog was more like
Q: this is good steel still, why not use it?
A: steel is never ideal, that's the problem.
Oh really.
Risk manage us nginx please. At least write out the steps, you must have a checklist or something, right?
Let's be honest, we just apt install it and read vulnerability reports when they hit /news.
- oopsallmagic 2y agoExactly. I don't believe that the argument that some software somewhere at some point could have some vague security flaw in it is usually good enough to justify not running the kinds of software most of us here work on. It's solipsistic, and honestly seems a little in bad faith. But it's also moot: if you're that afraid of vague security threats, then just don't expose your software to the internet. It's not difficult.
- lazide 2y agoLiterally never said that. Speaking of bad faith. the whole point in context was that exposing software to the internet is high risk, no matter how secure you think it is, because no software is truly ever secure given enough exposure. Talk about exhausting bullshit. But then what to expect from a green throw away?