3 ms·

You could read the comment guidelines. Instead you made an unnecessarily insulting comment with no real substance. Since you clearly have not bothered to read

You could read the comment guidelines. Instead you made an unnecessarily insulting comment with no real substance. Since you clearly have not bothered to read them, the guidelines are at the bottom of the site, or maybe try googling it.

ok_dad 2y ago
Walter constantly says things that are incorrect or lazy and no one calls him out, so this time I did so. I’m aware of the guidelines and the harsh language was because that’s all he understands. As you can see, he didn’t even care to read one or two decisions, because they’re in legalese. This is a man who writes compilers for a living, I would think he was smart enough to read some documents and determine for himself whether his “question” was answered there or not, but he literally doesn’t care. Asking leading questions is always put forth as “innocent” but it never is with these types of people. I don’t even know why I’m defending myself to you, I’m comfortable with what I’ve written here today. If dang thinks it’s rude he can ban my comments.
- WalterBright 2y ago
  > he didn’t even care to read one or two decisions, because they’re in legalese I did read the first two, but understood neither, because they were in legalese. I also googled using my exact question, and none of the results were anything but generic articles about the NLRB. > Asking leading questions is always put forth as “innocent” I didn't say it was "innocent", please don't make up quotes and put them in my mouth. I said it was a "fair" question. And it is.
- Kiboneu 2y ago
  > I don’t even know why I’m defending myself to you, I’m comfortable with what I’ve written here today. Seems contradictory. Maybe this is a cue to think honestly about why you feel compelled to defend yourself.

3 ms·

You could read the comment guidelines. Instead you made an unnecessarily insulting comment with no real substance. Since you clearly have not bothered to read

by Kiboneu 2y ago

ok_dad 2y ago
Walter constantly says things that are incorrect or lazy and no one calls him out, so this time I did so. I’m aware of the guidelines and the harsh language was because that’s all he understands. As you can see, he didn’t even care to read one or two decisions, because they’re in legalese. This is a man who writes compilers for a living, I would think he was smart enough to read some documents and determine for himself whether his “question” was answered there or not, but he literally doesn’t care. Asking leading questions is always put forth as “innocent” but it never is with these types of people. I don’t even know why I’m defending myself to you, I’m comfortable with what I’ve written here today. If dang thinks it’s rude he can ban my comments.
- WalterBright 2y ago
  > he didn’t even care to read one or two decisions, because they’re in legalese I did read the first two, but understood neither, because they were in legalese. I also googled using my exact question, and none of the results were anything but generic articles about the NLRB. > Asking leading questions is always put forth as “innocent” I didn't say it was "innocent", please don't make up quotes and put them in my mouth. I said it was a "fair" question. And it is.
- Kiboneu 2y ago
  > I don’t even know why I’m defending myself to you, I’m comfortable with what I’ve written here today. Seems contradictory. Maybe this is a cue to think honestly about why you feel compelled to defend yourself.