3 ms·
Very interesting! but not that - it was much more recent, few years ago. What I'm thinking of was not writing about a 22 year cycle; it was arguing for two in
by casenmgreen 2y ago
Very interesting! but not that - it was much more recent, few years ago. What I'm thinking of was not writing about a 22 year cycle; it was arguing for two independent cycles, one deep in the solar atmosphere, one toward the surface.
- defrost 2y agoSure, you more than likely did read a more recent paper. That said, the earlier paper was about two cycles, the already known 11 year cycle and seperate observations that only occurred every two 11 year cycles. There's a chance the two papers are related via a common coupled driver, or not.