4 ms·

The brigade with literal Nazi symbols as their main insignia. It's not a "literal Nazi" symbol. Importantly, it has a reverse orientation, and different propo

The brigade with literal Nazi symbols as their main insignia. It's not a "literal Nazi" symbol. Importantly, it has a reverse orientation, and different proportion of its segments when compared with the Wolfsangel symbol. When you hold the two up together -- the difference is quite noticeable. And even more importantly -- it just doesn't mean what you want it to mean. Azov maintains it wasn't derived from the Wolfsangel symbol, and is adamant that it is not intended as a symbol of Nazi affiliation or of support for Nazi ideology. In fact they say it derives from the abbreviation "National Idea", which means yes, they are self-described nationalists -- but not with any Nazi affiliation of the sort that you're trying to scare us with. From Wikipedia: Andreas Umland, a scholar from the Stockholm Center for Eastern European Studies, told Deutsche Welle that though it had far-right connotations, the Wolfsangel was not considered a fascist symbol by the population in Ukraine.[114] In 2022 political scientist Ivan Gomza wrote in Krytyka that the symbolism of the regiment had become associated with a "successful fighting unit that protects Ukraine", and wrote that other connotations are lost on most people in Ukraine. You don't have to like Azov or their beliefs. But the simple fact is, they do not use Nazi insignia, and when asked, their leaders uniformly state that they explicitly reject Nazism and antisemitism, and that they have Jewish members (and in fact a lot of native Russian speakers). They've even jumped on the pro-Israel bandwagon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vMAo_zOgBA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vMAo_zOgBA If you keep digging you can also find a precious video of Azov commanders line dancing with orthodox rabbis on one of their visits. You're delusional if you ... The irony here that on this particular subject at least -- the one who's been played and propagandized is you. That's why the usual actors who keep repeating the "Azov == Nazi" narrative based on trigger symbols, marginal sample data and other misleading information keep on doing so. Precisely because they know that it doesn't have to align with the facts -- and either way it will push your buttons, and spike your cortisol levels to exactly the range where they need them to be.

aprilthird2021 2y ago
Why do you do all this twisting and turning to try to excuse these symbols "Ah it's a reverse orientation, ah it's just a nationalist symbol with far-right connotations, it's not Nazi!" Why not just change the symbols because your biggest supporters and allies have issues with it and the history behind it (you know very well the history of Ukrainian collaboration with Germany in WWII and where these symbols come from. Sure it's complicated but that's where it comes from). If NATO can't show pictures of soldiers due to the insignia, if journalists have to ask the soldiers to remove certain patches before interviewing them, why do they wear them at all? Just because they stand next to Jews doesn't mean they aren't the kinds of people who love far-right Nazi symbols and what they mean. Said Qutb moved to the US and spent lots of time around Americans before starting an anti-Western ideological group. But all this could be eliminated if the insistence of Azov on their tarnished names and symbols were removed. Why do they cling to them so much? Why are they so resistant to such a sensible request? These are the things that make people hesitant to support them, and they are extremely aware of it. This is the reason the US had a ban on arming Azov for years till very recently. They know what it looks like and they fight to keep it that way. That should raise some concern for anyone.
- racional 2y ago
  The one doing the twisting and turning on this subject is you. The simple fact is -- you didn't do your homework on Azov, and so within minutes you got debunked. Own it, and move on.
  - aprilthird2021 2y ago
    > you didn't do your homework on Azov, and so within minutes you got debunked So it's not true that many Ukrainian regiments assisted the Nazis in WWII? It's not true that that is where these symbols come from? It's not true that the US had a ban on arming Azov for years for exactly this reason? It's not true that NATO can't post pictures of Ukrainian soldiers defending a sovereign territory from invaders because they wear Nazi insignia? It's not true that journalists have to ask the soldiers to remove their Nazi insignia when being photographed? In fact all are true. Here are the sources: https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/29/europe/ukraine-azov-movement-far-right-intl-cmd/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/29/europe/ukraine-azov-movement-... An image of a Ukrainian historical newspaper with a Nazi swastika and "Slava Ukraini" written at the top: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nove-zhittya.jpg#mw-jump-to-license https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nove-zhittya.jpg#m... https://www.newsweek.com/nato-says-it-didnt-notice-ukraine-soldiers-apparent-nazi-symbol-tweet-1686523 https://www.newsweek.com/nato-says-it-didnt-notice-ukraine-s... https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/05/world/europe/nazi-symbols-ukraine.html https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/05/world/europe/nazi-symbols... Don't close your eyes to facts and truth. The world is complex. Try to find the truth in that complexity
    - racional 2y ago
      So it's not true that many Ukrainian regiments assisted the Nazis in WWII? As in every country under the Nazi occupation. Including Russia, by the way -- and in significantly larger numbers than in Ukraine. But this was 80 years ago and is a completely different topic. Do you actually think this provides some kind of chain of implication as to anything happening on the ground today? Or are you just trying evoke an image of Ukrainians as basically congenital Nazis, and that's the your big subliminal message here? It's not true that that is where these symbols come from? In fact it's not true. The Azov insignia is not derived from the Wolfsangel, or any of the symbols used by the Galicia Division or any other collaborationist units. An image of a Ukrainian historical newspaper with a Nazi swastika and "Slava Ukraini" written at the top Seriously -- what's the logic here? What is this supposed to prove? Check in any American Nazi rally from the 1930s to the present; the photos are all over the place -- and (get ready to start trembling now) you'll invariably find prominent displays of swastika banners right along side the Stars and Stripes. Does that make it a Nazi flag?

aprilthird2021 2y ago

Why do you do all this twisting and turning to try to excuse these symbols "Ah it's a reverse orientation, ah it's just a nationalist symbol with far-right connotations, it's not Nazi!" Why not just change the symbols because your biggest supporters and allies have issues with it and the history behind it (you know very well the history of Ukrainian collaboration with Germany in WWII and where these symbols come from. Sure it's complicated but that's where it comes from). If NATO can't show pictures of soldiers due to the insignia, if journalists have to ask the soldiers to remove certain patches before interviewing them, why do they wear them at all? Just because they stand next to Jews doesn't mean they aren't the kinds of people who love far-right Nazi symbols and what they mean. Said Qutb moved to the US and spent lots of time around Americans before starting an anti-Western ideological group. But all this could be eliminated if the insistence of Azov on their tarnished names and symbols were removed. Why do they cling to them so much? Why are they so resistant to such a sensible request? These are the things that make people hesitant to support them, and they are extremely aware of it. This is the reason the US had a ban on arming Azov for years till very recently. They know what it looks like and they fight to keep it that way. That should raise some concern for anyone.

racional 2y ago
The one doing the twisting and turning on this subject is you. The simple fact is -- you didn't do your homework on Azov, and so within minutes you got debunked. Own it, and move on.
- aprilthird2021 2y ago
  > you didn't do your homework on Azov, and so within minutes you got debunked So it's not true that many Ukrainian regiments assisted the Nazis in WWII? It's not true that that is where these symbols come from? It's not true that the US had a ban on arming Azov for years for exactly this reason? It's not true that NATO can't post pictures of Ukrainian soldiers defending a sovereign territory from invaders because they wear Nazi insignia? It's not true that journalists have to ask the soldiers to remove their Nazi insignia when being photographed? In fact all are true. Here are the sources: https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/29/europe/ukraine-azov-movement-far-right-intl-cmd/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/29/europe/ukraine-azov-movement-... An image of a Ukrainian historical newspaper with a Nazi swastika and "Slava Ukraini" written at the top: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nove-zhittya.jpg#mw-jump-to-license https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nove-zhittya.jpg#m... https://www.newsweek.com/nato-says-it-didnt-notice-ukraine-soldiers-apparent-nazi-symbol-tweet-1686523 https://www.newsweek.com/nato-says-it-didnt-notice-ukraine-s... https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/05/world/europe/nazi-symbols-ukraine.html https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/05/world/europe/nazi-symbols... Don't close your eyes to facts and truth. The world is complex. Try to find the truth in that complexity
  - racional 2y ago
    So it's not true that many Ukrainian regiments assisted the Nazis in WWII? As in every country under the Nazi occupation. Including Russia, by the way -- and in significantly larger numbers than in Ukraine. But this was 80 years ago and is a completely different topic. Do you actually think this provides some kind of chain of implication as to anything happening on the ground today? Or are you just trying evoke an image of Ukrainians as basically congenital Nazis, and that's the your big subliminal message here? It's not true that that is where these symbols come from? In fact it's not true. The Azov insignia is not derived from the Wolfsangel, or any of the symbols used by the Galicia Division or any other collaborationist units. An image of a Ukrainian historical newspaper with a Nazi swastika and "Slava Ukraini" written at the top Seriously -- what's the logic here? What is this supposed to prove? Check in any American Nazi rally from the 1930s to the present; the photos are all over the place -- and (get ready to start trembling now) you'll invariably find prominent displays of swastika banners right along side the Stars and Stripes. Does that make it a Nazi flag?