6 ms·
Ah, yes, the remaining English speakers in Russia will overthrow the literal millions of the silovik class whose entire job is to repress (with violence) any in
by nullifidian 2y ago
Ah, yes, the remaining English speakers in Russia will overthrow the literal millions of the silovik class whose entire job is to repress (with violence) any independent political activity. There is no "lobbying" in Russia, if you didn't know.
If you hate all Russians just say you hate all Russians. No need for this "lobby your government" euphemistic BS.
- sqeaky 2y agoWe in the west can't change your government to ban hacking requests. We can block whole countries and make a practical reduction in hacks. Sorry that you got caught in the middle and feel you have no options. Maybe someone who does have options and makes their money from non-hacking will be inconvenienced and ask for change instead.
- wredcoll 2y agoSo political change in russia is literally impossible and everything will be exactly the same 50 years from now? Obviously not. Is such change easy? Again, obviously not, but the only way countries change is their own citizens wanting to make the change.
- grishka 2y agoOh we do want to make this change. Desperately. The only minor issue with that is that we lack any means to do so. I'll be sure to do my part as soon as the window of opportunity opens.
- firesteelrain 2y agoSure hope your govt is not monitoring your posts
- brokenmachine 2y agoIt's probably risky, but absolutely there's a means to do so. Be the change you want to see in the world. Change happens slowly at first, and then all at once.
- grishka 2y agoNo, there really isn't any means right now. Even peacefully protesting gets one arrested in minutes. It's not probably risky, it's risky with absolute certainty. I did participate in opposition activities that were 100% safe. I signed for Nadezhdin and voted for Davankov for example.
- brokenmachine 2y agoWhat you're saying is there's no 100% safe way, not that there is no way. Apparently desperately wanting change in Russia means desperately wanting someone else to change it for you, which perfectly aligns with the apathy the Russian population is infamous for. If Putin somehow became unable to provide the population with food for three days, or pay his security team, you'd all quickly discover what desperately means, and I'm confident the problem would resolve itself quickly. Your population's apathy has become the whole world's problem. pls fix.
- grishka 2y agoSo what, exactly, is your suggestion? "Do something"?
- brokenmachine 2y agoYes, precisely that.
- grishka 2y agoAnd nothing more concrete?
- brokenmachine 2y agoNot sure what concrete advice you expect me to write here in a public comment. I'm not in Russia, only started learning about Russia 3 years ago, and know nothing about you. I presume you're good with computers so have the ability to access (and distribute) information that others may not. There's historical precedent, research how people have fought oppression in the past. Many books and manuals have been written about how this is done. You may be able to access forums where like minded people can discuss and possibly work together. Obviously stay as safe as you can. "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has. We must remember that one determined person can make a significant difference, and that a small group of determined people can change the course of history." You're the best one to know what you can achieve - but I can tell you this, it's not nothing. Anything that makes the mechanisms of oppression less efficient is a step in the right direction. Every mechanism has weak points, leaky abstractions and incomplete assumptions. Find them.
- nullifidian 2y ago>So political change in russia is literally impossible Precisely. It's basically impossible. There has to be at least be a generational change, or a severe economic / military loss if we are talking about this decade, but even that isn't a guarantee since the system is perpetuating itself with force, with economic self-interest to continue doing so. Isolating Russian citizens from western sources of information (in addition to what the Russian government is already doing by itself) is not only not helping, it's counterproductive, since rejection engenders a rejection in return, lowering the probability that an inflection point in the Russian history would result in anything western. >countries change Authoritarian countries change when their enforcement class relaxes and loses control. It takes decades for it to occur. If there is no relaxation, then no change occurs, as demonstrated by numerous countries, not only Russia. Right now the control and propaganda are very tight. "Wanting to make change" publicly is literally a life-threatening activity.
- dead5ea 2y agoThe idea that Westerners might "hate" Russians (the people -- not the dictators and their regimes' activities) always seemed so silly to me that I assumed the majority of the related propaganda would be laughed off. In my experience, the worst general case you have from Americans is absolute "other side of the planet" indifference. Hence the apathetic practice of blocking Russian-originating IP traffic... This may be arguably worse than hate. A slightly better case, I think, is a healthy segment of the American populace thinks Russians are like the FPSRussia YouTube channel from a few years ago. (Disclaimer: Not sure what the status of that channel is now. Plus, I always figured he was geographically in the southern USA.)