4 ms·
Robotics labs aren't expensive: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=robot+kit http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?ur
by richcollins 14y ago
Robotics labs aren't expensive: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=robot+kit http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dap...
- smacktoward 14y agoI'm not sure you realize just how strapped for cash most school districts are. The average K-12 teacher in the US spends around $350 out of their own pocket each year just to buy supplies like books, pencils and glue that schools and parents can't or won't pay for. Only 8% of teachers can get through a year without spending any of their own money on supplies. (http://thejournal.com/articles/2010/07/08/teachers-spend-1.3-billion-out-of-pocket-on-classroom-materials.aspx http://thejournal.com/articles/2010/07/08/teachers-spend-1.3..., http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2010/08/most_teachers_spend_their_own.html http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2010/08/most_teachers_spend_...) If school districts can't afford to buy pencils, it's unlikely they can afford to buy robots, no matter how cheap the robots are.
- anamax 14y ago> I'm not sure you realize just how strapped for cash most school districts are. They're actually not that cash-strapped. They just don't choose to spend money on education. It's unclear how giving them more money will change that. Seriously - take the spending per-pupil year and multiply it by the number of kids in a class room. Subtract the teacher's salary and benefits. Subtract the cost of the room and educational facilities (like the library). Heck - subtract the cost of the playground. Now, ask yourself where the rest of the money went.