4 ms·
You made a universal statement, namely, "there is no secure software". If you had written, "99% of software used in anger is insecure," or, "most leaders of mo
by hollerith 2y ago
You made a universal statement, namely, "there is no secure software".
If you had written, "99% of software used in anger is insecure," or, "most leaders of most organizations don't realize how insecure the software is that their organizations depend on," or, "most exploits go undetected", I would not have objected.
- lazide 2y agoThat is quite explicitly not what I wrote. You might want to re-read my comment. My point not only stands, but is reinforced by your comments. If software is eventually compromised, it was not secure. I have yet to see any software that does not eventually get compromised when it gets enough exposure. That those compromises can get fixed after the fact doesn’t change that. And ignoring the explicit cases where your examples were disproven doesn’t help your case either.