3 ms·
> I didn't wish to continue that conversation Then why did you continue the conversation? I'm not forcing you to make snide jabs at me in a public space, and y
by James_K 2y ago
> I didn't wish to continue that conversation
Then why did you continue the conversation? I'm not forcing you to make snide jabs at me in a public space, and you can hardly blame me for responding to them.
> it would take far too much energy for me to explain things step by step and I'd gain nothing from it
If you cannot explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
- astrobe_ 2y ago> I'm not forcing you to make snide jabs at me in a public space, Ok, sorry. That was a poor way to invite that person to read the parallel thread. It's a bit frustrating to deal with claims based on nothing but theory when I have at least two decades of practical experience on these topics. > If you cannot explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. First, that answers something I didn't write (of course I can explain those things simply, the problem is that it would easily make a whole article) and secondly, what you wrote ignore the fact that teaching is a skill, so not all experts are good teachers.
- James_K 2y agoOkay, that's well and good, but you are sat there saying that you can manually input data into an embedded device, but for some reason can't connect a computer to it. Unless it has a built-in keyboard, that simply isn't true. If it was true, it would be trivial to prove. You could just name the device and situation.