3 ms·

Yawn. This happens all the time with NATO or Nato-associated airplanes, too. You just don't see it on western media. ONLY on RT, Sputnik-News(which are censore

Yawn. This happens all the time with NATO or Nato-associated airplanes, too. You just don't see it on western media. ONLY on RT, Sputnik-News(which are censored/DNS-blocked for most europeans), or other russian-language media(which I don't follow). With not so recent developments regarding photoshoppery/AI-fakery, and so on, I wouldn't give a shit, if I hadn't seen it myself. (With some overlay of accurate GNNS position/direction/bearing/ground-/airspeed on a map) Some low-resolution snapshot does not count, even if it says 'copyright swedish government'. Because https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_submarine_incidents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_submarine_incidents (scroll waay down), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_MS_Estonia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_MS_Estonia , cough cough https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord_Stream_pipeline_sabotage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord_Stream_pipeline_sabo... This all stinks like competitive dick wankery, so relax, have a Smørrebrød, or something. edit: s/Just/ONLY + (With some overlay of accurate GNNS position/direction/bearing/ground-/airspeed on a map)

belter 2y ago
> This happens all the time with NATO or Nato-associated airplanes, too. Can you provide a reference? Even if its from the well known, press controlled, Russian news? We can then correlate the event with other sources...
- LargoLasskhyfv 2y ago
  From the top of my mind only https://www.rt.com/russia/578757-british-intercepted-black-sea/ https://www.rt.com/russia/578757-british-intercepted-black-s... and https://www.rt.com/news/574445-russia-shot-down-british-plane/ https://www.rt.com/news/574445-russia-shot-down-british-plan... by typing rc-135 into RT.com's search field. But there have been more. I've just grown wary/tired of all that shit happening lately, and not having bookmarked any of that stuff way before it all escalated. Also not limited to that type of plane alone, there have been some events involving these https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_340_AEW%26C https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_340_AEW%26C , some norwegian F-16s and some long-range british Tornadoes near Murmansk.
  - belter 2y ago
    Those two links use a self signed certificate wont connect. The other link is info on the details of the airplane. In 2023 this occurred 300 times: "NATO intercepted Russian military aircraft over 300 times in 2023" - https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_221598.htm https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_221598.htm I ask again, do you have an event we can refer to?
    - LargoLasskhyfv 2y ago
      Dude... why is it my problem when something on your side won't connect? Here it just worked. From an exit where RT is DNS-blocked, btw. No problem from Colorado either. Fix your cargo-culted setup. And I don't give a shit about what NATO says. There are some 'asymmetries' in which side does it more often, but that's it. I won't spoil my sunday by (re)digging deeper, just to spoon-feed you.
      - belter 2y ago
        Just to state the facts. You could not provide one example of the thing you say happens all the time.
        LargoLasskhyfv 2y ago
        Yawn. I did. With the two ones YOU said they wouldn't load because of certificate error. And really didn't been in the mood to dig deeper into the shit I've not exactly lost interest in, but don't cherish to return to dig deeper. Also having not bookmarked them at the times when I did. That would require finding and going back to sites of retired veterans from involved airbases at the times of cold war, where they sort of 'blog' about this, and honor the fallen where some plane didn't make it back, for various reasons, bad weather, mechanical failure, not being shot down. But with very detailed, meanwhile declassified mission profiles. I think I may even have learned about some of those sites from comments here on HN. (not sure anymore), too lazy too seek. This went on and on through the whole of cold war. Btw. what do you think have those U2 and SR-71 planes been doing? Maybe the russkies seeing that still as payback? Whatever, that old crap wasn't even what I've been referring to, only meant about the last two decades. I'm not making this up. But still, not going to (re-)search that again. See it as PTSD...(not sorry)

belter 2y ago

> This happens all the time with NATO or Nato-associated airplanes, too. Can you provide a reference? Even if its from the well known, press controlled, Russian news? We can then correlate the event with other sources...

LargoLasskhyfv 2y ago
From the top of my mind only https://www.rt.com/russia/578757-british-intercepted-black-sea/ https://www.rt.com/russia/578757-british-intercepted-black-s... and https://www.rt.com/news/574445-russia-shot-down-british-plane/ https://www.rt.com/news/574445-russia-shot-down-british-plan... by typing rc-135 into RT.com's search field. But there have been more. I've just grown wary/tired of all that shit happening lately, and not having bookmarked any of that stuff way before it all escalated. Also not limited to that type of plane alone, there have been some events involving these https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_340_AEW%26C https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_340_AEW%26C , some norwegian F-16s and some long-range british Tornadoes near Murmansk.
- belter 2y ago
  Those two links use a self signed certificate wont connect. The other link is info on the details of the airplane. In 2023 this occurred 300 times: "NATO intercepted Russian military aircraft over 300 times in 2023" - https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_221598.htm https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_221598.htm I ask again, do you have an event we can refer to?
  - LargoLasskhyfv 2y ago
    Dude... why is it my problem when something on your side won't connect? Here it just worked. From an exit where RT is DNS-blocked, btw. No problem from Colorado either. Fix your cargo-culted setup. And I don't give a shit about what NATO says. There are some 'asymmetries' in which side does it more often, but that's it. I won't spoil my sunday by (re)digging deeper, just to spoon-feed you.
    - belter 2y ago
      Just to state the facts. You could not provide one example of the thing you say happens all the time.
      - LargoLasskhyfv 2y ago
        Yawn. I did. With the two ones YOU said they wouldn't load because of certificate error. And really didn't been in the mood to dig deeper into the shit I've not exactly lost interest in, but don't cherish to return to dig deeper. Also having not bookmarked them at the times when I did. That would require finding and going back to sites of retired veterans from involved airbases at the times of cold war, where they sort of 'blog' about this, and honor the fallen where some plane didn't make it back, for various reasons, bad weather, mechanical failure, not being shot down. But with very detailed, meanwhile declassified mission profiles. I think I may even have learned about some of those sites from comments here on HN. (not sure anymore), too lazy too seek. This went on and on through the whole of cold war. Btw. what do you think have those U2 and SR-71 planes been doing? Maybe the russkies seeing that still as payback? Whatever, that old crap wasn't even what I've been referring to, only meant about the last two decades. I'm not making this up. But still, not going to (re-)search that again. See it as PTSD...(not sorry)