10 ms·
Anyone can bring forth a class action lawsuit. Nothing has been ruled on that, so it doesn't support that claim. But more to the point: being misled into purch
by ETH_start 2y ago
Anyone can bring forth a class action lawsuit. Nothing has been ruled on that, so it doesn't support that claim.
But more to the point: being misled into purchasing it is entirely different than being misled while driving it, and blaming an accident on thinking the auto assist didn't need their attention as a result.
That is not what the lawsuit is alleging.
It stands to reason that if there was anything approaching a credible case that any driver thinks they don't need to be engaged while driving a Tesla, because of misleading naming of its driver assist features, some law firm somewhere would have organized a lawsuit on behalf of accident victims by now.
So the evidence supports my position.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- mynameisvlad 2y agoYour argument was, and I quote, > If you want to challenge that notion in court, be my guest. I pointed out that it is, in fact, being challenged. Right now. And has already been several times before, with Tesla settling out of court specifically to prevent any repercussions from a guilty verdict. If you wanted to talk about successful cases, then that should have been your argument. At this point, you’re just moving the goal posts.
- ETH_start 2y agoThe notion that no Tesla driver got into an accident because the name of the driver assistance program misled them into thinking they could be inattentive while driving has not been challenged in court. That lawsuit doesn't allege that, and if it did, I would wager money it would lose.