3 ms·
You're not an "influencer" if you're female and the audience is 92% men. You're just a porn star. > At one point, she offered Instagram subscriptions to users
by globular-toast 2y ago
You're not an "influencer" if you're female and the audience is 92% men. You're just a porn star.
> At one point, she offered Instagram subscriptions to users willing to pay a monthly fee for extra photos and videos.
How more obvious can it be?
This article is clearly the result of trying to justify selling your daughter as a porn star. They'll take the money, but oh how they wish it didn't have to be like this (it doesn't, but I guess the alternatives involve actually working to do something useful).
- Bostonian 2y ago'You're not an "influencer" if you're female and the audience is 92% men. You're just a porn star.' That's unfair. There are young female chess influencers such as the Botez sisters and Anna Cramling, where I'd guess that the vast majority of the audience is male. Those women are not porn stars, even though their viewership is boosted by their youth and good looks.
- globular-toast 2y agoI'm sure there are a few that would be popular anyway, but I'm highly sceptical. There's basically a whole category of porn which is "not explicitly porn". I guess this scratches the male itch for "she doesn't do this for anyone else". YouTube etc is full of channels like this. You just have to ask yourself, would I be watching, and would the viewership be anywhere near this large, if it was presented by a nerdy, spotty teenage boy? No? Then it's porn.