3 ms·
There may be an argument that reducing the voting age could result in more politically engaged under-30s (and eventually, over-30s). At 18 most people have too
by jwells89 2y ago
There may be an argument that reducing the voting age could result in more politically engaged under-30s (and eventually, over-30s).
At 18 most people have too much going on (high school graduation coming up, studying for and applying to college and/or looking into employment, potentially seeking housing if their parents are kicking them out, etc) to have much capacity for political participation. That picture is significantly different just a couple of years earlier, where time and mental bandwidth is generally at more of a surplus, and so if people became capable of voting at that age it stands to reason that more would take advantage of it (and continue to after that).
- maxerickson 2y agoThe argument doesn't need to be about political engagement, it's about liberty. Denying the vote to a thoughtful 16 year old is worse than giving the vote to a 29 year old that takes it for granted. And then same thing applies to a 2 year old, if they can independently mark the ballot...