60 ms·
I have a growing disdain for "_ considered harmful" articles. I swear I see at least one every month, and it's extremely cliche and pretentious.
by tail_exchange 2y ago
I have a growing disdain for "_ considered harmful" articles. I swear I see at least one every month, and it's extremely cliche and pretentious.
- musicale 2y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9744916 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9744916
- grogenaut 2y agoyou should make a "considered harmeful articles considered harmful" to put an end to the madness with the perfect coup de grace
- SahAssar 2y agoAlready done: https://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html https://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
- m463 2y agoThe first one I read was "csh considered harmful" and I stuck to sh type shells Looks like the first one was "goto considered harmful" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Considered_harmful https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Considered_harmful that said, I strongly disagree with docker being harmful. In fact, I think it is an elegant solution to a number of problems and I use it frequently to my benefit. And I love Dockerfiles The alternative seems to be being a very pedantic bare metal sysadmin.