4 ms·
Or, I return whatever content I want, within the bounds of the law, based on whatever parameters I decide. What's your problem with that? Again, connect to my s
by marcus0x62 2y ago
Or, I return whatever content I want, within the bounds of the law, based on whatever parameters I decide. What's your problem with that? Again, connect to my server or don't. But don't tell me what type of response I'm obligated to provide you.
If I think a given request is from an LLM training module, I don't have any legal obligation whatsoever to return my original content. Or a 400-series response. If I want to intersperse a paragraph from Don Quixote between every second sentence, that's my call.
- int_19h 2y agoBut nobody is arguing for that. Instead, what the server owners want is to mandate the clients connecting to them to provide enough information to reliably reject such connections.
- marcus0x62 2y agoThere are literally people in this thread arguing that it is "unethical" to discriminate based on user agent.
- skeledrew 2y agoThis argument of freedom seems applicable on both sides. A site owner/admin is free to return whatever response they wish based on the assumed origin of a request. An LLM user/service is free to send whatever info in the request that elicits a useful response.
- marcus0x62 2y agoI don’t have any problem with that.