3 ms·
>If the "content" had no value, why would google go through the effort of scraping it and presenting it to the user? They don't present it all, they summarize
by itsoktocry 2y ago
>If the "content" had no value, why would google go through the effort of scraping it and presenting it to the user?
They don't present it all, they summarize it.
And let's be serious here, I was being polite because I don't know the OPs business. But 99% of this sort of content is SEO trash and contributes to the wasteland that the internet is becoming. Feel free to point me to the good stuff.
- luaKmua 2y agoPedantry aside, let's restate as "present the core thoughts" to the user, which still implies value. I agree that most of google front page results are SEO garbage these days, but that's a separate issue from claiming that are summary of a piece of information removes the original of its value. I'd even argue that it transfers it from one entity to the other in this case.
- lyu07282 2y agoI would also think that the intrinsic value is different. If there is a hotel on a mountain writing "quality content" about the place, to them it really doesn't matter who "steals" their content, the value is in people going to the hotel on the mountain not in people reading about the hotel on the mountain. Like to society the value is in the hotel, everything else is just fluff around it that never had any real value to begin with. > Feel free to point me to the good stuff. Travel bloggers and vloggers, but that is an entirely different unaffected industry (entertainment/infotainment).
- itsoktocry 2y ago>Travel bloggers and vloggers I've no doubt some good ones exist, but my instinct is to ignore every word this industry says because it's paid placement and our world is run by advertisers.