> Is anyone actually arguing that a super-intelligent AI is, like, physically impossible or something? John Searle's arguments about "causal powers" are someti

> Is anyone actually arguing that a super-intelligent AI is, like, physically impossible or something? John Searle's arguments about "causal powers" are sometimes interpreted that way. I think he doesn't discount the general possibility of AI, though, just the possibility of actual conscious/understanding minds arising from structures (such as computer programs) that lack some yet-unidentified physical similarity to biological brains.