3 ms·

I didn’t say anything about the magazine. I was referring to where the article was originated. You’ll notice your second article wasn’t published from within C

I didn’t say anything about the magazine. I was referring to where the article was originated. You’ll notice your second article wasn’t published from within China. Specifically : America’s assassination attempt on Huawei is backfiring The company is growing stronger—and less vulnerable An American man cutting the red Huawei flowers off their stems with a scythe. illustration: julia kuo Jun 13th 2024| —> shenzhen <—

crazygringo 2y ago
You seem to be misunderstanding. The location listed on articles refers to where the reporting was primarily done by the reporter(s) involved. The article isn't "published from within China". And it's misleading to say it's "material originating from China". It's material originating from the Economist, a British publication, from a reporter who traveled to (or is based in) Shenzhen to research this story. China has no say whatsoever in the content of this story. The point of putting "Shenzhen" as the location is simply that this wasn't reported by a journalist merely sitting on their couch in London. Good reporting generally requires you to actually go to the places you're reporting on.
- fnordpiglet 2y ago
  No it’s typically where the reporter is -based- not where the reporting was done.
gruez 2y ago
>I was referring to where the article was originated. You’ll notice your second article wasn’t published from within China. ??? "Chaguan travelled to Tongren to weigh claims that coercive assimilation is now the norm. While in Qinghai he was followed by up to five unmarked cars. Tibetan-speaking officers (one of whom flashed a police badge) filmed and eavesdropped on conversations. " Or are you claiming that going into China and doing anti-CCP reporting is fine as long as the article isn't "published" in China (whatever that means)?
- fnordpiglet 2y ago
  One article was written using reporting from China, the article was submitted by a correspondent based in China. There’s a world of difference.

crazygringo 2y ago

You seem to be misunderstanding. The location listed on articles refers to where the reporting was primarily done by the reporter(s) involved. The article isn't "published from within China". And it's misleading to say it's "material originating from China". It's material originating from the Economist, a British publication, from a reporter who traveled to (or is based in) Shenzhen to research this story. China has no say whatsoever in the content of this story. The point of putting "Shenzhen" as the location is simply that this wasn't reported by a journalist merely sitting on their couch in London. Good reporting generally requires you to actually go to the places you're reporting on.

fnordpiglet 2y ago
No it’s typically where the reporter is -based- not where the reporting was done.

gruez 2y ago

>I was referring to where the article was originated. You’ll notice your second article wasn’t published from within China. ??? "Chaguan travelled to Tongren to weigh claims that coercive assimilation is now the norm. While in Qinghai he was followed by up to five unmarked cars. Tibetan-speaking officers (one of whom flashed a police badge) filmed and eavesdropped on conversations. " Or are you claiming that going into China and doing anti-CCP reporting is fine as long as the article isn't "published" in China (whatever that means)?

fnordpiglet 2y ago
One article was written using reporting from China, the article was submitted by a correspondent based in China. There’s a world of difference.