> Given that it was 20 yrs ago it is possible that this was an effect that was not well known and it is better controlled today. This was known at the time. If

> Given that it was 20 yrs ago it is possible that this was an effect that was not well known and it is better controlled today. This was known at the time. If you think about it, it's an obvious effect if you can't correct all of the surface that will admit light in. I had a great outcome with my eye surgery from around that time, with my vision needing no correction for 20 years now. However I distinctly recall the doctor saying that if some features were a bit wider (iirc iris), then his equipment wouldn't be viable for me. I feel strongly that the poster who had this situation had an unethical doctor.