2 ms·
> Perhaps it’s theoretically possible. But honestly, it’s likely no one would. > Neither exists here - there’s especially no positive reputation to be had in h
by sneak 2y ago
> Perhaps it’s theoretically possible. But honestly, it’s likely no one would.
> Neither exists here - there’s especially no positive reputation to be had in hacking something 46 years old that likely can’t be fixed again after you do.
This is perhaps the most plainly wrong thing I have read in a long time. Being able to claim "I hacked Voyager" is one of the most ultimate hacker flexes one could possibly perform.
A long long time ago I read an account (which may have been fiction, but had too many details to be casually dismissed) on a very private BBS of someone hacking a NASA space probe over many months. I think it is ridiculous to assume that nobody would try to do this.
- Schiendelman 2y agoIn any hacker community I’m aware of, I think you would be significantly ostracized for damaging a purely scientific effort that simply could not be repaired or replaced.
- johnnyanmac 2y agoThere will always be sabetours. But The effort to hack a sattelite farther from Earth than any spacecraft isn't the same as hijacking some wifi. Those lower effort trolls will be limited by skill and hardware, as the GP said. The effort to acquire both basically means you become an engineer at NASA and then go rouge one night. But why would you ruin your professional career, reputation, and livelihood for "the ultimate hacker flex"? And is it even hacking at that point? You already had the keys. You're just performing the ultimate social engineering experiment that has nothing but downsides for humanity.