4 ms·
One point not covered but clearly understood tacitly by the author is that the representativeness of a fact degrades over time. While it may be true that someon
by iandanforth 2y ago
One point not covered but clearly understood tacitly by the author is that the representativeness of a fact degrades over time. While it may be true that someone did something 10 years ago, that fact may not be a true reflection of their character today. Thus a statement may be technically true, but practically false, and thus should be considered defamatory (under the modern American definition).
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- shadowgovt 2y agoI like this notion (that any ancient past actions must carry facts of subsequent actions) better than trying to push a "right to be forgotten."