4 ms·
Nice work. The authors train a model with two contrastive objectives: (1) predict which video clip corresponds to a given audio file, and (2) predict which audi
by cs702 2y ago
Nice work. The authors train a model with two contrastive objectives: (1) predict which video clip corresponds to a given audio file, and (2) predict which audio clip corresponds to a given video clip. Together, these two training objectives induce the model to learn to associate different sounds from a given audio clip, like words forming a spoken sentence, with different objects shown in a video clip, like the pixels depicting the subject of the spoken sentence -- and vice versa.
If I understand the paper correctly, the model was trained on tens of thousands of video and audio clip pairs, randomly sampled 64 million times (80 samples/batch x 0.8 million training steps). For comparison, over the course of a baby's first two years of life, the baby will get trillions of sound samples (measured at 44.1KHz) and billions of frames of visual data (measured at 30fps). It's not too hard to imagine that a large AI model in the near future, trained on comparably vast quantities of audio and video data, can learn to recognize objects and words, like a baby.
The most exciting takeaway, for me, is that a bigger model inside a robot body should be able to integrate learning in this manner across all five human data modalities -- vision, hearing, smell, touch, taste -- as well as any other data modalities for which the robot has sensors -- radar, lidar, GPS position, etc. We sure live in exciting times!
Link to paper, code, demo, and data:
https://mhamilton.net/denseav https://mhamilton.net/denseav
- NooneAtAll3 2y agofirst half a year-year babies can't focus their eyes, iirc still several of OOM difference
- cs702 2y ago> still several of OOM difference I agree. Nothing I wrote above disagrees with your statement.
- HeatrayEnjoyer 2y agoCan't they just add more?
- HeatrayEnjoyer 2y ago(I can't edit find the button to edit my comment) Is memory really an expected bottleneck in the long term?
- pugio 2y agoIt sounds like you're viewing "OOM" as "Out of Memory", when the parent meant "Order of Magnitude" - meaning that a baby's "training data" is several Orders of Magnitude more than what the DenseAV model from the paper used.
- vessenes 2y agoTo massively anthropomorphize convnets, perhaps this serves the purpose of training up shape / color recognition first before fine detail assessment happens.