3 ms·
> Saying that it will "never" work is myopic. The implication is that Tesla can't make it work. In the same way that Meta are unlikley to make AR glasses a "th
by KaiserPro 2y ago
> Saying that it will "never" work is myopic.
The implication is that Tesla can't make it work. In the same way that Meta are unlikley to make AR glasses a "thing".
> As a Tesla M3 owner (in Europe where we don't have FSD yet) I cannot wait to have it for long road trips on highways where I want to relax and have a "copilot" do some of the "thinking" & driving for me.
depending on which country you are in, you'll be on the hook for any mistakes.
> It's real and it's only a matter of time before it's better than humans in most circumstances ...
This is the fallacy of statistics. Its probably better/similar performance than humans in 80% of cases. The problem is, it performs significantly worse when it fails. It does not fail safe. Thats the really hard part.
I also question the wisdom of using unverified recordings of average drivers to train on. Unless you know how go they are, you're going to be feeding really bad behaviours into the model.
- nelsonic 2y agoIf people are already using FSD (supervised) on a daily basis, it's working. It's not "Level 5" yet, but they don't claim it is. Totally agree that the "Full Self Driving" name is marketing BS. What should they call it instead? "Kinda Works Autonomous Driving, Please Pay Attention" ... ;-)