2 ms·
>Meters are better than feet in every way even if you use miles for long distances. There are 5280 feet in a mile, but 1600 meters in a mile[1]. One of these nu
by ruined 2y ago
>Meters are better than feet in every way even if you use miles for long distances. There are 5280 feet in a mile, but 1600 meters in a mile[1]. One of these numbers is far easier to deal with.
why have you forsaken the furlong, the chain, and the rod?
- aidenn0 2y agoTwo reasons: 1. To use all 3 would require remembering more conversion ratios 2. More people (even in the US) are familiar with meters than those units. I was not familiar with the Rod at all, which is the closest to meter in utility for discussing block lengths.