The author is making a few leap of faith in this article. First, his example of the efficiency of ML+search for playing Chess is interesting but not a proof th

The author is making a few leap of faith in this article. First, his example of the efficiency of ML+search for playing Chess is interesting but not a proof that this strategy would be applicable or efficient in the general domain. Second, he is implying that some next iteration of ChatGPT will reach AGI level, given enough scale and money. This should be considered hypothetical until proven. Overall, he should be more scientific and prudent.