4 ms·
OpenAI did the reasonable and logical thing here. They're easing themselves around regulatory hurdles, possibly avoiding Senate committee interrogations, and l
by imchillyb 2y ago
OpenAI did the reasonable and logical thing here. They're easing themselves around regulatory hurdles, possibly avoiding Senate committee interrogations, and legitimizing themselves all with a single board seat.
Snowden's being disingenuous. He knows all of this and has chosen to ignore the above in service of an agenda.
What _actual_ choice did OpenAI have here? If they do not accept an NSA board member today, what would OpenAI be forced to accept later?
- OutOfHere 2y agoOpenAI is very guilty of pushing for regulation of AI, leading to all these issues in the first place. They themselves created the poison of regulation for which they now purchased the antidote. They had a choice to not scaremonger or push for regulation, but to fight for freedom on constitutional grounds. Also, they should focus on developing AGI, not on buying wortheless executives that the consumer or taxpayer has to pay for.
- imchillyb 2y agoOpenAI is very guilty of pushing for regulation of AI, in order to be at the forefront of that technology. Regulatory capture is SOP for tech bros.