2 ms·
Not really. Living things absorb CO2 with the intent to live. The CO2 isn't the important part, the living (replicating) is. It's entirely plausible that one co
by xboxnolifes 2y ago
Not really. Living things absorb CO2 with the intent to live. The CO2 isn't the important part, the living (replicating) is. It's entirely plausible that one could improve efficiency by removing the requirement of living.