3 ms·
I don't understand why this is surprising. The shareholders already voted to do this once, and it was revoked by a judge in Delaware for obvious political reaso
by Dig1t 2y ago
I don't understand why this is surprising. The shareholders already voted to do this once, and it was revoked by a judge in Delaware for obvious political reasons. Why is it surprising that the same people who voted for it the first time are voting for it again? It even got the same percentage of approval votes as the first time it happened.
- dazc 2y agoTurkeys don't vote for Thanksgiving - shock, horror!
- JamesBarney 2y agoIt's surprising because it's after the fact. They get to keep the gains even if they revoke the pay package.
- tzs 2y ago> I don't understand why this is surprising. The shareholders already voted to do this once, and it was revoked by a judge in Delaware for obvious political reasons What obvious political reasons?