3 ms·

> gets incinerated and provides heat over communal heating – ideally. How is it ideal to increase the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere even further?

• bsza 2y ago
  So does any microorganism that can break down plastic, but without heating your home.
  • lukan 2y ago
    They usually do not extract the oil from deep underground, like we do.
    • bsza 2y ago
      The argument is between burning already existing plastic vs letting it rot.
• adwn 2y ago
  Presumably OP meant that if plastics are incinerated anyway, it's better to get some additional use out of that.
• zo1 2y ago
  If it's a controlled incineration with the appropriate filters and capture mechanisms, I doubt it's that bad.
• mrguyorama 2y ago
  Only 6% of the world's petrochemical usage is to make plastic. If we decarbonize everything else but merely burn every gram of plastic we produce, that's a win, both from a climate change perspective and from a plastic waste perspective. Proper incineration is probably the most reliable, most effective way to deal with human waste. Well made and managed landfills are also perfectly capable of dealing with human waste, but they are a long term project, and there's a lot of time for a dumb management or politician to decide you don't need to fund it as well and now a hundred years of hard work to protect the environment goes down the drain when your now improperly managed landfill is basically a superfund site. There's less chance for one idiot to do long term damage with incineration.