3 ms·

Done at "...another CEO-turned-MAGA ghoul". Snark-as-a-Service seems oxymoronic.

• sbarre 2y ago
  He's not wrong though. David Sacks isn't exactly shy about being pro-Trump for all the worst/selfish reasons.
  • smitty1e 2y ago
    I find "MAGA ghoul" offensive.
    • sbarre 2y ago
      Honest question: why? MAGA's brand is being unapologetically offensive. Surely they can take what they give.
      • smitty1e 2y ago
        You: - assert without evidence - rationalize This does not refute my point in the slightest: calling someone a 'ghoul' is pejorative, even if one finds their platform unattractive.
        • sbarre 2y ago
          I wasn't actually trying to refute anything, sorry if it came across that way. It was two separate things. First I wanted to know what you found offensive, and you answered. My second comment was more of a broad statement that a movement like MAGA that is itself intentionally pejorative and bigoted towards so many others in society (evidence of this is widely available) can certainly take some name-calling without crying foul. It had nothing to do with your sensibilities or your right to be offended by said name calling. But I wasn't clear about it I guess.
          • smitty1e 2y ago
            "Make America Great Again" is self-explanatory. As is the source of any "bigotry" on offer in this thread. One hopes that you have an excellent weekend.